Readings on bin Laden part 7: No end to leader's bloody legacy | The Australian

No end to leader's bloody legacy | The Australian: "Bin Laden appointed Ayman al-Zawahiri, an Egyptian medical doctor as his successor. The former leader of the Egyptian Islamic Jihad, Ayman was head of the information committee of al-Qa'ida. His book, The Knights Under the Prophet's Banner, formed the blue-print for al-Qa'ida strategy. His wife and two children were killed in the US bombing of Tora Bora mountains. Although hardworking and bright, Ayman lacks the global charisma and appeal of bin Laden. Although al-Qa'ida is likely to seek revenge from Pakistan and the US for killing its leader, its strategy and tactics are unlikely to change in the foreseeable future. Bin Laden will remain a hero for his followers and supporters. He will be memoralised and a few groups will carry out attacks in his name.

Bin Laden became such a prominent figure because of his ability and willingness to work together with disparate leaders and groups from different parts of the world. His key strength was to mount a few spectacular attacks, mobilise like-minded groups to join him and to galvanise public support for a sustained campaign."

Contrary to popular belief, he was not only a spiritual leader. He was an operational leader that actively planned and prepared attacks. He worked very closely with Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, the mastermind of the 9/11 attacks. However, after 9/11, the security environment forced him to play a low-profile role.

Nonetheless, through the release of audio and video tapes, he played a vital role in shaping the threat environment.

Readings on bin Laden part 6: No end to leader's bloody legacy | The Australian

No end to leader's bloody legacy | The Australian: "The threat posed by al-Qa'ida and its associated groups is likely to persist. Bin Laden called for the creation of Islamic states wherever Muslims lived. Furthermore, his attack invited retaliation from the Western world. As the Western governments reacted rather than responded to the threat of terrorism, especially the US invasion of Iraq, more Muslims were radicalised than ever. In addition to sustaining two dozen groups, bin Laden has crafted an ideology that finds resonance in the Muslim world, especially in conflict zones. As there are conflicts in more than a dozen Muslim countries where al-Qa'ida's message finds resonance, the threat of ideological extremism and terrorism will persist."

Readings on bin Laden part 5: No end to leader's bloody legacy | The Australian

No end to leader's bloody legacy | The Australian: "Among the terrorist groups in Southeast Asia trained and financed by al-Qa'ida was Jemaah Islamiah. Led by Abu Bakar Bashir, an Indonesian radical cleric, JI killed 202 innocent people, including 88 Australians, in Bali on October 12, 2002. Almost all the JI leaders who planned and prepared the Bali attack as well as the dozen other attacks staged in Indonesia were indoctrinated and trained by al-Qa'ida. After the Bali attack, the Australian government built an offshore counter terrorism capacity in Indonesia and in The Philippines to fight al-Qa'ida-associated groups such as JI and the Abu Sayyaf Group. As JI was particularly close to al-Qa'ida, both bin Laden and his associates threatened Australia for its role that gave a significant capacity to governments in the region to fight terrorism."

Readings on bin Laden part 4: No end to leader's bloody legacy | The Australian

No end to leader's bloody legacy | The Australian: "The Australian threat environment significantly changed after 9/11. More than 100 Australian citizens travelled to The Philippines, Indonesia, Pakistan and Afghanistan to receive training organised by al-Qa'ida and its associated groups. On their return, they radicalised a tiny segment of the Australian Muslim community. The Australian authorities detected and neutralised cells in Sydney and Melbourne.

The diaspora and migrant communities of Australia remain susceptible to ideology of al-Qa'ida and its associated groups. In the view of the radicalised few, bin Laden remains their hero for fighting the US, its allies and friends, in revenge for deliberately killing Muslims and purposely attacking Islam.

The threat to Australia from the followers and supporters of bin Laden is likely to persist in the foreseeable future."

Readings on bin Laden part 3: No end to leader's bloody legacy | The Australian

No end to leader's bloody legacy | The Australian: "After al-Qa'ida's deadly attacks on the US on September 11, 2001, bin Laden directed most of his attacks in the global south, mostly in the Muslim world. Riding on the success of 9/11, al-Qa'ida inspired and instigated two dozen groups it had ideologised, trained and financed to emulate al-Qa'ida tactics. With the difficulty of attacking the US, Europe and Australia, al-Qa'ida attacked Western targets in the global south. However, more Muslims have been killed, maimed and injured in al-Qaida-directed and inspired operations and in conflict zones. Under criticism, bin Laden and his fellow ideologues argued that if a good Muslim were killed by accident, he would go to heaven."

Readings on bin Laden part 2: No end to leader's bloody legacy | The Australian

No end to leader's bloody legacy | The Australian: "As the unofficial representative of the Saudi kingdom, bin Laden travelled to Pakistan in 1980 to support the decade long anti-Soviet multinational Afghan mujaheddin campaign. Having distinguished himself as the leader of the Arab mujaheddin, bin Laden drew support from a cadre of participants and supporters that fought in Muslim conflict zones. After a dispute with the Saudi regime over basing US troops in Saudi Arabia, he directed terrorist attacks against the Saudi regime. However, his prime target was the US. To fight US-supported Muslim regimes, bin Laden created a dozen camps for training young Muslim fighters in Sudan from 1991 to 1996 and in Afghanistan from 1996 to 2001."

Readings on Bin Laden part 1: No end to leader's bloody legacy

No end to leader's bloody legacy | The Australian: "OSAMA bin Laden influenced the contemporary wave of global terrorism more than any other terrorist figure. While his own group al-Qa'ida spearheaded the most devastating attacks, bin Laden built a global terror network by bringing together like-minded groups from conflict zones in Asia, Africa and the Middle East.

Both operationally and ideologically, al-Qa'ida influenced insurgent and terrorist groups and spawned a movement that will outlive its founder and leader.

For three decades straddling two centuries, bin Laden played a significant role in globalising terrorism. In the Muslim world, he played the most decisive role in spreading the tactic of suicide terrorism. Having conducted mass fatality attacks against the US, bin Laden provoked the US, its allies and friends to intervene in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Although puritanical in his belief, bin Laden also harnessed modern communications platforms to politicise, radicalise and mobilise millions of supporters and sympathisers.

Most importantly, he crafted an ideology of deep hatred against the West and against non-Muslims. He could communicate complex messages in simple words. Speaking softly with a Koran in one hand and an AK47 in the other, he built mass appeal across the Muslim world."

Weigh in on this issue. What can you say? Bin Laden Killing: the Legal Basis

Bin Laden Killing: the Legal Basis - Council on Foreign Relations: "The killing is not prohibited by the longstanding assassination prohibition in Executive Order 12333 because the action was a military action in the ongoing U.S. armed conflict with al-Qaeda and it is not prohibited to kill specific leaders of an opposing force. The assassination prohibition also does not apply to killings in self-defense. The executive branch will also argue that the action was permissible under international law both as a permissible use of force in the U.S. armed conflict with al-Qaeda and as a legitimate action in self-defense, given that bin Laden was clearly planning additional attacks.
Some critics of the administration's legal theory that the United States is in an armed conflict with al-Qaeda might--if they were consistent with their past criticisms--argue that the United States did not have a right to use military force against bin Laden outside of Afghanistan, and that Washington should instead have sent an extradition request to Pakistan or asked the Pakistani government to arrest bin Laden. But such traditional critics may prefer to remain silent in this instance."